norml04 - Page 1
Page 1
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
12 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision belt, re publicatior_ in
the Federal Reporter or U.$.App. D.C. Report& Users are requested to
[w]ith one exception, none of [these doctors] could identi- notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made
fy under oath the scientific studies they swore they relied before the bound volumes go to press.
on. Only one had enough knowledge to discuss the
scientific technicalities involved. Eventually, each one
admitted he was basing his opinion on anecdotal evi-
' ni[e fNtateg ;aurt af ppea[
dence on _tories he heard from patients, and on his
impressions about the drug. Foa THE DISTR3CT OF COLUMBIA ClRCUFI"
Final Order, 57 Fed. Reg. at 10,502-03. These findings are
consistent -with the view that only rigorous scient}fie proof can
satis_" the CSA's "currently accepted medical use" require- Argued October 1, 1993 Decided February 18, 1994
sent. Id. at 10,500.
!!L Co'_ches_o_,' No, 92-1168
For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are
Denied. ALLIANCE FOR CANNABIS THERAPEUTICS.
PETITIONER
V_
_')RUG ENFORCEMENT ADMIN[STRAT:ON,
_ESPONDENT
PHYSICiMqS ASSOCIA'r'ION FO_{ AIDS CARE AND THE
[.,Y_',PHO_,'t_. Feul.q[.wrIoN OF A_;'IER_CA.
INTERVENORS
Biils of costs must be filed withbt 1.4 days after entry of judgment
The court looks with disfavor upon motions to file bills of costs out
of time.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index